A River of News

Manchester City artificially boosted finances by more than £900mn, says panel

8 publications, in the order they reported. The story spread over 51 hours 52 minutes. Words in highlight are ones the first headline did not use. All top stories · On NewsMarkets

Share: Bluesky · X · Facebook · LinkedIn · Email

Publications over time

16:37 UTC20:29 UTC8 publications
Publications in order of reporting
#Time (UTC)After the firstPublicationHeadline
1firstFinancial Times (paywall)Manchester City artificially boosted finances by more than £900mn, says panel
2+18 minutesBleacher ReportPremier League Says Manchester City Inflated Revenues By $1 Billion Using 'Sham Contracts' by Joseph Zucker
3+9 hours 25 minutesSouth China Morning Post (limited free articles)Manchester City guilty of using ‘sham’ deals to distort finances, Premier League says
4+13 hours 49 minutesBBC£1.2bn on transfers with £830m inflated in accounts - Man City's 'asterisk era'
5+17 hours 57 minutesFrance 24Man City scandal: 'Sham' deals and inflated revenues by FRANCE24
6+19 hours 39 minutesThe GuardianManchester City could be forced to pay Premier League up to £50m in legal costs by Sam Cunningham
7+33 hours 53 minutesThe Japan TimesLegal challenges could prolong Manchester City saga for years
8+51 hours 52 minutesBloomberg (limited free articles)Manchester City Accused of ‘Sham’ Contracts, Facing Possible Relegation by Julia Press, David Fox, David Gura

Who covered it, by audience

7 of 8 publications on this story have an audience score.

Publications by the political lean of their audience
Audience leans Democratic (2)Mixed audience (5)Audience leans Republican (0)
None

Audience lean comes from Robertson, R. E., Jiang, S., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Lazer, D., and Wilson, C. (2018), Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2(CSCW), article 148, used with the authors' permission. The score shows which party's registered voters, on Twitter, shared an outlet's links more. It is not a rating of the outlet's own slant, and it dates from 2018. See how we use it.