Swiss voters expected to shun stricter neutrality
9 publications, in the order they reported. The story spread over 86 hours 41 minutes. Words in highlight are ones the first headline did not use. All top stories · On NewsMarkets
Publications over time
| # | Time (UTC) | After the first | Publication | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | first | The Japan Times | Swiss voters expected to shun stricter neutrality | |
| 2 | +30 hours 26 minutes | NPR | Is Switzerland's neutrality at a crossroads? by Imogen Foulkes | |
| 3 | +30 hours 59 minutes | Al Jazeera | Switzerland’s neutrality vote is asking the wrong question | |
| 4 | +73 hours 26 minutes | Financial Times (paywall) | Swiss voters to decide fate of centuries-old neutrality | |
| 5 | +76 hours 3 minutes | ABC News | Voters in Switzerland decide on right-wing party's proposal to tighten neutrality rules | |
| 6 | +76 hours 53 minutes | Times of India | Switzerland's neutrality test puts Nato ties, Russia sanctions at stake by ARYAN SINGH | |
| 7 | +77 hours 15 minutes | Deutsche Welle | Switzerland: Referendum to decide on stricter neutrality | |
| 8 | +78 hours 3 minutes | France 24 | Switzerland votes on country's neutrality by FRANCE24 | |
| 9 | +86 hours 41 minutes | South China Morning Post (limited free articles) | Swiss reject tighter neutrality rules in referendum backed by right-wing populist party |
Who covered it, by audience
9 of 9 publications on this story have an audience score. None of the rated publications whose audience leans Republican covered it, while 4 on the other side did.
| Audience leans Democratic (4) | Mixed audience (5) | Audience leans Republican (0) |
|---|---|---|
| None |
Audience lean comes from Robertson, R. E., Jiang, S., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Lazer, D., and Wilson, C. (2018), Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2(CSCW), article 148, used with the authors' permission. The score shows which party's registered voters, on Twitter, shared an outlet's links more. It is not a rating of the outlet's own slant, and it dates from 2018. See how we use it.