13-year-old Chinese swimming prodigy Yu Zidi cruises through heats at Asian Games
8 publications, in the order they reported. The story spread over 82 hours 53 minutes. Words in highlight are ones the first headline did not use. All top stories · On NewsMarkets
Publications over time
| # | Time (UTC) | After the first | Publication | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | first | The Japan Times | 13-year-old Chinese swimming prodigy Yu Zidi cruises through heats at Asian Games | |
| 2 | +5 hours 59 minutes | South China Morning Post (limited free articles) | Asian Games: China’s Yu Zidi caps off golden debut with record-setting win | |
| 3 | +6 hours 28 minutes | Times of India | China's 13-year-old swimmer breaks Asian Games record, wins 200m butterfly gold by SHUBHANSHU DWIVEDI | |
| 4 | +11 hours 7 minutes | BBC | Yu, 13, wins record-breaking first major gold medal | |
| 5 | +23 hours 47 minutes | The Guardian | Thirteen-year-old swim sensation sets women’s 200m butterfly record at Asian Games by Agence France-Presse | |
| 6 | +34 hours 5 minutes | Al Jazeera | Who is Yu Zidi, China’s 13-year-old swimming sensation? | |
| 7 | +55 hours 56 minutes | CBS News | 6-year-old girl sets Rubik's Cube speed record, Chinese state media say | |
| 8 | +82 hours 53 minutes | Deutsche Welle | China's 13-year-old swimming star raises questions on child athletes |
Who covered it, by audience
8 of 8 publications on this story have an audience score. None of the rated publications whose audience leans Republican covered it, while 5 on the other side did.
| Audience leans Democratic (5) | Mixed audience (3) | Audience leans Republican (0) |
|---|---|---|
| None |
Audience lean comes from Robertson, R. E., Jiang, S., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Lazer, D., and Wilson, C. (2018), Auditing Partisan Audience Bias within Google Search, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2(CSCW), article 148, used with the authors' permission. The score shows which party's registered voters, on Twitter, shared an outlet's links more. It is not a rating of the outlet's own slant, and it dates from 2018. See how we use it.